Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 882 F.2d 67 - Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor v. Gardner

Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor v. Gardner’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
January 2011
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently January 2011

4 federal appellate · 1 district ·

701989199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Bowles v. Seminole Rock & Sand Co. · Potomac Electric Power Co. v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs · Diamond Roofing Co., Inc. v. Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission and W. J. Usery, the Secretary of Labor, S. D. Mullins Company, Inc. v. Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission and W. J. Usery, the Secretary of Labor, Lance Roofing Company, Inc. v. Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission and W. J. Usery, the Secretary of Labor · Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs v. Mangifest · 6 O.S.H. Cas.(bna) 1440, 1978 O.S.H.D. (Cch) P 22,628 Bethlehem Steel Corporation v. Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission and F. Ray Marshall, Secretary of Labor

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “tempered by our duty to independently insure that the agency's interpretation comports with the language it has adopted.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[T]he one-year employment requirement sets a floor for the operator's connection with the miner, below which the operator cannot be held responsible for the payment of benefits,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “proceeding in good faith should not be subjected to a trap brought about by an interpretation of a regulation hidden in the bosom of the agency.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.