In re Hodges’s Empirical Analysis
882 F.3d 1107 · 2018
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1295 · 35 U.S.C. § 102 · 35 U.S.C. § 103 · 35 U.S.C. § 120
Relies on Graham v. John Deere Company of Kansas City Calmar Inc · Florida Power & Light Co. v. Lorion · In re Gartside · Teva Pharm. United States, Inc. v. Sandoz, Inc. · Axiom Resource Management, Inc. v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A prior art reference anticipates a patent's claim when the four corners of the document 'describe every element of the claimed invention, either expressly or inherently, such that a person of ordinary skill in the art could practice the invention without undue experimentation.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.