Bennett v. Google, LLC’s Empirical Analysis
882 F.3d 1163 · 2018
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 47 U.S.C. § 230 (Communications Decency Act § 230)
Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Cohen v. California · Zeran v. America Online, Inc. · Kaempe v. Myers · Fair Housing Council v. Roommates.com, LLC
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[n]o provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“The Communications Decency Act mandates dismissal if (i) [the defendant] is a "provider or user of an interactive computer service," (ii) the information for which [the plaintiff] seeks to hold [the defendant] liable was "information provided by another information content provider," and (iii) the complaint seeks to hold [the defendant] liable as the "publisher or speaker" of that information.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“any person or entity that is responsible, in whole or in part, for the creation or development of information provided through the Internet or any other interactive computer service.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.