Salgado-Sosa v. Sessions’s Empirical Analysis
882 F.3d 451 · 2018
Citation profile
2 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1158 (§ 208 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1231 (§ 241 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Gomis v. Holder · Massis v. Mukasey · Marynenka v. Holder · Crespin-Valladares v. Holder · Hernandez-Avalos v. Lynch
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“any reasonable adjudicator would be compelled to conclude to the contrary.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“no meaningful distinction between whether Salgado-Sosa was threatened because of his connection to his stepfather [or] because MS-13 sought revenge on him for an act committed by his stepfather,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“When, as here, the BIA affirms the IJ's decision with an opinion of its own, we review both decisions.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.