Trois v. Apple Tree Auction Ctr., Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
882 F.3d 485 · 2018
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1391 · 28 U.S.C. § 1404 · 28 U.S.C. § 1406
Relies on International Shoe Co. v. Washington · Burger King Corporation v. Rudzewicz · 134 S. Ct. 1115 - Walden v. Fiore · 134 S. Ct. 568 - Atlantic Marine Constr. Co. v. United States Dist. Court for Western Dist. of Tex. · Wilson v. Belin
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A defendant may be subject to personal jurisdiction because of the activities of its agent within the forum state ....”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“with traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.