United States v. Bailey’s Empirical Analysis
882 F.3d 716 · 2018
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 922 (Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 924 · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act)
Relies on Smith v. United States · United States v. Lipford · United States v. Wilson · United States v. Castillo · United States v. Huddleston
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[b]ecause it was the opportunity to purchase a firearm that brought the informant to [the seller] and made possible the secondary sale of marijuana to the informant, the facts support the finding that [the seller's] possession of the weapon furthered the marijuana sale.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.