Booth v. Kelley’s Empirical Analysis
882 F.3d 759 · 2018
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2253 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · 132 S. Ct. 1309 - Martinez v. Ryan · Martinez v. Ryan · Carter v. Hopkins · Weisgram v. Marley Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“must indulge a strong presumption that counsel's conduct falls within the wide range of reasonable professional assistance[.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Camacho v. Kelley“deprive[d] the defendant of a fair trial.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Camacho v. Kelley
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.