Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 882 FSUPP 379 - Arons v. Donovan

Arons v. Donovan’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
2
states following
January 2018
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1367 · 47 U.S.C. § 315

Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corporation · Conley v. Gibson · Haines v. Kerner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “capable of repetition yet evading review”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.