Johnson v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently May 2017
5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Williamson v. Williamson · Brimhall v. Brewster · Roscoe v. Roscoe · Mid-West Federal Savings Bank v. Epperson · Paulsen v. Malone
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(a) Except as provided under subsection (b), a magistrate shall report findings in an evidentiary hearing, a trial, or a jury’s verdict to the court. The court shall enter the final order. (b) If a magistrate presides at a criminal trial, the magistrate may do the following: (1) Enter a final order. (2) Conduct a sentencing hearing. (3) Impose a sentence on a person convicted of a criminal offense.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Tongate v. State“there [was] no evidence that the trial court adopted the magistrate's oral findings and conclusions or otherwise granted [appellee's] motion to correct error within thirty days of the hearing.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“extinguishes the court's authority to rule on the motion and any subsequent ruling is a nullity.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Moore
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.