Leyba v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
13 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently February 2019
13 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Hicklin v. State · Burke v. State · Kahlsdorf v. State · Kupec v. State · Hamburg v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The district court has wide discretion in determining appropriate conditions of probation. A probation condition is valid if it is “reasonably related to ... rehabilitation”; it should be deleted if it is “unrelated to the criminal conduct for which [the probationer] was convicted and is not reasonably related to future criminal conduct.” Hamburg v. State, 820 P.2d 523, 531 (Wyo.1991).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Meerscheidt v. State“take the law into his own hands and defy the conditions of his probation[.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Bazzle v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.