882 So. 2d 212 - Burnside v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
May 2017
most recently cited
13 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · 454 So. 2d 468 - Stringer v. State · 584 So. 2d 426 - Mohr v. State · 524 So. 2d 313 - Cabello v. State · Neal v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Once a deficient performance is shown, a `defendant must show that there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel's unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different. A reasonable probability is a probability sufficient to undermine confidence in the outcome.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Jones v. State · Havard v. State“[i]t is the duty of the appellant to demonstrate both error in failing to receive the instruction and the prejudice to the defense.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Jones v. State · Havard v. State“[E]ven where error has occurred, we will not reverse a conviction where the overwhelming weight of the evidence supports the guilty verdict.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.