882 So. 2d 731 - State v. Dooley’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
48
cited by 48 later decisions
1
states following
June 2018
most recently cited
47 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Tibbs v. Florida · Murphy v. Florida · MacArthur Co. v. Johns-Manville Corp. · Hudson v. Louisiana
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 48 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[i]s biased, prejudiced, or personally interested in the cause to such an extent that he would be unable to conduct a fair and impartial trial[.]”
8 later decisions quote this exact passage“|7A. Second degree murder is the killing of a human being: (1) When the offender has a specific intent to kill or to inflict great bodily-harm; or (2) When the offender is engaged in the perpetration or attempted perpetration of ... armed robbery, first degree robbery, second degree robbery, simple robbery, ... even though he has no intent to kill or to inflict great bodily harm.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“A motion for a continuance based upon the absence of a witness must state: (1) Facts to which the absent witness is expected to testify, showing the materiality of the testimony and the necessity for the presence of the witness at the trial; (2) Facts and circumstances showing a probability that the witness will be available at the time to which the trial is deferred; and (3) Facts showing due diligence used in an effort to procure attendance of the witness.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.