882 So. 2d 977 - Moore v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
35
cited by 35 later decisions
1
states following
April 2019
most recently cited
33 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 622 So. 2d 941 - Tripp v. State · 773 So. 2d 7 - Armstrong v. Harris · 823 So. 2d 757 - Hall v. State · Cook v. State · Hodgdon v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a single sentencing range is not established under the CPC as occurred under the prior guidelines.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[U]nder the CPC, together the individual offenses only establish the minimum sentence that may be imposed; a single maximum sentence is not established-each individual offense has its own maximum sentence, namely the statutory maximum for that offense.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Champagne v. State“the CPC has no ceiling other than the statutory maximum punishment ... and permits a consecutive sentence for each offense.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Champagne v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.