Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 882 SW2D 214 - State v. Fox

State v. Fox’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
August 2005
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Energy Cooperative, Inc. v. Phillips Petroleum Co. · State v. Grim · State v. Dulany · State v. Bernard · State v. Purlee

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[A] person, with the knowledge of the presence and nature of a substance, has actual or constructive possession of the substance. A person has actual possession if he has the substance on his person or within easy reach and convenient control. A person who, although not in actual possession, has the power and the intention at a given time to exercise dominion or control over the substance either directly or through another person or persons is in constructive possession of it. Possession may also be sole or joint. If one person alone has possession of a substance possession is sole. If two or more persons share possession of a substance, possession is joint[.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.