Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

882 S.W.2d 269

Uzzle v. Edney

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 28, 1994

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 1994-06-28

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently April 1999

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1994-06-28

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2Appellant, Robert Uzzle, appeals from the January 6,1993, order of the Circuit Court of Jefferson County quashing garnishment against respondent, Cheryl Ann Edney. We affirm.

¶3We have reviewed the briefs and arguments of the parties, as well as the transcript and the legal file, and find no clear error in the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the trial court. In addition, we find that no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We, therefore, affirm the judgment of the trial court pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). The parties have been provided with a memorandum, solely for their own information, setting forth the reasons for our decision.

/882/sw2d/269 · .json · Public domain