State v. Raines’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
20 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently July 2011
20 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Blanton v. General Electric Credit Corp. · State v. Cabbage · Johnson v. Florida · State v. Grace
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“For you to find the defendant guilty of [premeditated first degree murder], the State must have proven to you, the jury, beyond a reasonable doubt the existence of the following essential elements .... that the lolling was premeditated.:.. Premeditation means that the intent to kill must have been formed prior to the act itself.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Mann“is injured, killed, had property stolen, or had property destroyed by the perpetrator of the crime.” State v. Lewis, 44 S.W.3d at 508 (quoting State v. Raines, 882 S.W.2d 376, 384 (Tenn.Crim.App.1994)). 7 . Cases in which the”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Imfeld
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.