Hass v. Oregon State Bar’s Empirical Analysis
883 F.2d 1453 · 1989
Citation profile
17 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently January 2019 · most notably Trailer Marine Transport Corp. v. Rivera Vazquez (1992), Wade v. State Bar of Arizona (1991)
17 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1 (§ 1 of the Sherman Antitrust Act) · 15 U.S.C. § 1012 (§ 2 of the McCarran-Ferguson Act) · 15 U.S.C. § 1013 (§ 3 of the McCarran-Ferguson Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Relies on Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising Commission · Vandygriff v. Phillips · Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc. · Parker v. Brown · Hannahville Indian Community v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“`Not every exercise of state power with some impact on interstate commerce is invalid. A state statute must be upheld if it "regulates even-handedly to effectuate a legitimate local public interest, and its effects on interstate commerce are only incidental ... unless the burden imposed on such commerce is clearly excessive in relation to the putative local benefits.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“requirement of active state supervision serves essentially an evidentiary function: it is one way of ensuring that the actor is engaging in the challenged conduct pursuant to state policy.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“clearly intend[ ] to displace competition in a particular field with a regulatory structure ... in the relevant market.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.