Priddy v. Edelman’s Empirical Analysis
883 F.2d 438 · 1989
Citation profile
32 federal appellate · 2 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 81 later decisions — most recently August 2024 · most notably Monette v. Electronic Data Systems Corp. (1996), Enertech Electrical, Inc. v. Mahoning County Commissioners (1996)
32 federal appellate · 2 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 78N (§ 14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934)
Relies on United States v. Owens · Alder v. United States · Wingo v. Wedding · Piper v. Chris-Craft Industries, Inc. · Aronson v. Lewis
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 81 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[w]e normally decline to consider issues not raised in the appellant's opening brief.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“A party is not entitled to wait until the discovery cutoff date has passed and a motion for summary judgment has been filed on the basis of claims asserted in the original complaint before introducing entirely different legal theories in an amended complaint.”); Feldman v. Allegheny Int'l, Inc., 850 F.2d 1217, 1225 (7th Cir.1988) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Putting the defendants 'through the time and expense of continued litigation on a new theory, with the possibility of additional discovery, would be manifestly unfair and unduly prejudicial.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.