Bal v. Ad Moyer’s Empirical Analysis
883 F.2d 45 · 1989
Citation profile
28 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently March 2018 · most notably Cordoba-Chaves v. Immigration & Naturalization Service (1991), Vergara-Molina v. Immigration & Naturalization Service (1992)
28 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1105A (§ 106 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1254 (§ 244 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Cheng Fan Kwok v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Wong Wing Hang v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Achacoso-Sanchez v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Bothyo v. Moyer · Williams v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“was made without a rational explanation, ... inexplicably departed from established policies, or rested on an impermissible basis.”
7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[the] alien may seek to reopen the deportation proceedings, see 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (b), to suspend deportation and adjust the alien’s status, see 8 U.S.C. § 1254 (a), to depart voluntarily, see 8 U.S.C. § 1254 (e), or to stay the deportation order for a limited time, see 8 C.F.R. § 243.4 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.