United States v. Capozzi’s Empirical Analysis
883 F.2d 608 · 1989
Citation profile
32 federal appellate · 3 district · 9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 55 later decisions — most recently August 2013 · most notably State v. Landrum (1990), United States v. Morrow (1991)
32 federal appellate · 3 district · 9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1006 · 18 U.S.C. § 1341 (White-Collar Crime Penalty Enhancement Act of 2002) · 18 U.S.C. § 1343 · 18 U.S.C. § 371 · 18 U.S.C. § 6001 · 18 U.S.C. § 6002
Relies on Washington v. Texas · McNally v. United States · California State Board of Equalization v. Western Marina Corp. · Lisenba v. People of State of California · Santoni v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 55 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[e]very court of appeals which has considered the question [of court granted immunity] has rejected the Third Circuit's Smith holding as being a violation of the doctrine of separation of powers.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“it is clear that such an order is an extraordinary remedy, to be used sparingly, and then only where the proffered evidence is 'clearly exculpatory.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.