Tucker v. Makowski’s Empirical Analysis
883 F.2d 877 · 1989
Citation profile
18 federal appellate · 6 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently December 2023 · most notably United States v. Castillo (1998), Hatch v. Oklahoma (1995)
18 federal appellate · 6 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Blockburger v. United States · Haines v. Kerner · Wainwright v. Sykes · Ashe v. Swenson · Brown v. Ohio
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“State court rulings on the admissibility of evidence may not be questioned in federal habeas proceedings unless they render the trial so fundamentally unfair as to constitute a denial of federal constitutional rights.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent“successive trials arising from admittedly separate crimes, but stemming from the same criminal transaction [may violate an accused's right to due process] in the form of his right to be free of prosecutorial attempt[s] to wear out the accused by a multitude of cases with accumulated trials”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.