Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 883 F.2d 986 - Ikner Lee v. Ikner

Ikner Lee v. Ikner’s Empirical Analysis

883 F.2d 986 · 1989

Citation profile

96
cited by 96 later decisions
April 2019
most recently cited

3 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 96 later decisions — most recently April 2019 · most notably Goldberg Securities, Inc. v. Scarlata (1992), Hope v. Walker (1995)

3 federal appellate ·

6101989199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 523

Relies on Tinker v. Colwell · Huntington v. City of New York · Chrysler Credit Corp. v. Rebhan · Halpern v. First Georgia Bank · United Bank of Southgate v. Nelson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 96 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(a) A discharge ... does not discharge an individual debtor from any debt— (6) for willful and malicious injury by the debtor to another entity or to the property of another entity ...”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “'wrongful and without just cause or excessive even in the absence of personal hatred, spite or ill-will.'”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “(1) the issue at stake was identical to the one involved in the prior litigation; (2) the issue was actually litigated in the prior litigation; and (3) the determination of the issue in the prior litigation was a critical and necessary part of the judgment in that earlier action.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.