United States v. Werdene’s Empirical Analysis
883 F.3d 204 · 2018
Citation profile
8 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2252 · 18 U.S.C. § 3117 (§ 108 of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986) · 18 U.S.C. § 3231 · 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 636
Relies on United States v. Leon · Schmerber v. State of California · United States v. Ross · United States v. Calandra · Elkins v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he issuing magistrate's lack of authority has no impact on police misconduct, if the officers mistakenly, but inadvertently, presented the warrant to an innocent magistrate.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“[t]he activating computers ... of any user or administrator who logs into [Playpen] by entering a username and password.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“[T]he Rule 41(b) violation was of constitutional magnitude because at the time of the framing ... a warrant issued for a search or seizure beyond the territorial jurisdiction of a magistrate's powers under positive law was treated as no warrant at all.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.