Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 883 F.3d 425 - Singer v. Reali

Singer v. Reali’s Empirical Analysis

883 F.3d 425 · 2018

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
April 2025
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 1 district ·

Relationships

Applies 15 U.S.C. § 78A (§ 1 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) · 15 U.S.C. § 78J (§ 10 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) · 15 U.S.C. § 78M (§ 13 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) · 15 U.S.C. § 78T (§ 20 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) · 15 U.S.C. § 78U (§ 21d of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) · 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 31 U.S.C. § 3729 (False Claims Act) · 31 U.S.C. § 3730 (False Claims Act)

Relies on Basic Inc. v. Levinson · Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd. · Dura Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Broudo · Stoneridge Investment Partners, LLC v. Scientific-Atlanta, Inc. · Ganino v. Citizens Utilities Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “specify each statement alleged to have been misleading, the reason or reasons why the statement is misleading, and, if an allegation regarding the statement or omission is made on information and belief ... state with particularity all facts on which that belief is formed.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “(1) a material misrepresentation or omission by the defendant; (2) scienter; (3) a connection between the misrepresentation or omission and the purchase or sale of a security; (4) reliance upon the misrepresentation or omission; (5) economic loss; and (6) loss causation.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “imposes additional pleading requirements to prevent Securities Exchange Act claims from being 'employed abusively to impose substantial costs on companies and individuals whose conduct conforms to the law.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.