Citicasters, Inc. v. McCaskill’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000A (Civil Rights Act of 1964)
Relies on Will v. Michigan Department of State Police · Sosna v. Iowa · Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit Authority · Smith v. Robinson · Zurcher v. Stanford Daily
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a] literal reading of the statute reveals that an affidavit can only be submitted when a search warrant is obtained after non-compliance with a subpoena duces tecum,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Claire McCaskill, the Prosecuting Attorney of Jackson County, Missouri, assisted in executing the search warrant on plaintiff at its business premises.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“a government entity bypasses the primary protection provided by a subpoena.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.