883 F. Supp. 2d 1055 - O'Brien v. Mitchell’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

7 district ·

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “[The Defendant’s] argument that the facts underlying the state criminal case are immaterial does not specifically controvert those facts, and the Court will therefore deem those facts admitted.”)). . Section 60-1A-2 of the Horse Racing Act, N.M. Stat. Ann. §§ 60 -1A-1 through 60-1A- 30/defines”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Simon v. Taylor · 960 F. Supp. 2d 1200 - Nordwall v. PHC-LAS Cruces, Inc.

2. “The Reply must contain a concise statement of those facts set forth in the Response which the movant disputes or to which the movant asserts an objection. Each fact must be lettered, must refer with particularity to those portions of the record upon which the movant relies, and must state the letter of the non-movant’s fact. All material facts set forth in the Response will be deemed undisputed unless specifically controverted.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 49 F. Supp. 3d 920 - Walton v. New Mexico State Land Office

3. “(1) the issue previously decided is identical with the one presented in the action in question, (2) the prior action has been fully adjudicated on the merits, (3) the party against whom the doctrine is invoked was a party, or in privity with a party, to the prior adjudication, and (4) the party against whom the doctrine is raised had a full and fair opportunity to litigate the issue in the prior action.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Goldstone