Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 883 N.E.2d 770 - Pearson v. State

Pearson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2008

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
states following
June 2019
most recently cited

17 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Tumulty v. State · Ladd v. State · Miller v. State · White v. State · Shaffer v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The principal purpose of restitution is to vindicate the rights of society and to impress upon the defendant the magnitude of the loss the crime has caused.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “'[A]n order of restitution is as much a part of a criminal sentence as a fine or other penalty.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.