Raess v. Doescher’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

1 district · 23 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “[oluly trial objections, not motions in limine, are effective to preserve claims of error for appellate review. Failure to object at trial to the admission of the evidence results in waiver of the error, notwithstanding a pri- or motion in limine.”

   3 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. Peaver v. State · Lay v. State

2. “[a] mere general objection, or an objection on grounds other than those raised on appeal, is ineffective to preserve an issue for appellate review.”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. Saral Reed and Durham School Services, Inc. v. Richard Bethel · D.H., a Minor, by Her Parent, A.M.J., and A.M.J. Individually v. Mary Whipple, and Robert Whipple (Deceased)

3. “[The reviewing] court will look only to the evidence and inferences therefrom which support the jury's verdict. We will not deem a verdict to be the result of improper considerations unless it cannot be explained on any other reasonable ground. Thus, if there is any evidence in the record which supports the amount of the award, even if it is variable or conflicting, the award will not be disturbed.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. TRW Vehicle Safety Systems, Inc. v. Moore