Parrish v. Lilly’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently April 2015
6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Murphy v. Florida · Lee v. Baltimore Hotel Co. · Wright v. Bernstein · State v. McFall · Moore v. Middlewest Freightways, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[elach and every person who sits on a jury, regardless of the number of jurors required to render a verdict, must satisfy the constitutional and statutory requirements of impartiality.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Subjecting a party to anything less than twelve impartial jurors, where twelve jurors are guaranteed, will not survive judicial serutiny.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Fields v. Saunders“this Court will not engage in speculation regarding the influence such juror may or may not have had on the other members of the jury.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Fields v. Saunders
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.