State v. Vincent’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 19 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently June 2019
1 federal appellate · 19 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Pena · State v. Thurman · State v. Ramirez · State v. Sery · Barry v. Brower
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““employment status and earning capacity; financial aid from family or friends; financial assistance from state and federal programs; [the defendant’s] necessary living expenses and liabilities; [the defendant’s] unencumbered assets, or any disposition thereof, and borrowing capacity; and, the relative amount of court costs to be waived.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“that if the facts establish that two people are living together as a domestic unit, without regard to whether they are legally married, then both persons’ incomes may properly be considered in determining whether either of them is indigent. Such a situation would arise when the two people junction as a single economic unit.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent“are not fundamental departures from earlier standard-of-review law. Rather, they clarify and further define basic positions that have long served as the foundation for standard-of-review law both nationally and within Utah.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.