883 So. 2d 115 - Campbell v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
October 2017
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Bruton v. United States · Doyle v. Ohio · 749 So. 2d 262 - Waldon v. State · 770 So. 2d 1025 - Carr v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Since there was a legitimate trial tactic or purpose involved in putting the statements into evidence, there is no ground to find that the waiver of the right of confrontation was invalid.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“that his Sixth Amendment right to confront witnesses was violated when his trial attorney introduced certain statements made by [his] co-indictee,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“so fundamental that it generate[d] a miscarriage of justice that rises to the level of plain error.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.