Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 883 SO2D 385 - Coderre v. State

Coderre v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
August 2013
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 549 So. 2d 649 - Tingley v. State · 651 So. 2d 1213 - State v. Dell'Orfano

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]ime is not ordinarily a substantive part of an ... information and there may be a variance between the dates proved at trial and those alleged in the ... information as long as: (1) the crime was committed before the return date of the indictment; (2) the crime was committed within the applicable statute of limitations; and (3) the defendant has been neither surprised nor hampered in preparing his defense.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.