Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 883 So. 2d 425 - In Re Hoffman

883 So. 2d 425 - In Re Hoffman’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
2
states following
May 2018
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 459 So. 2d 520 - Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. Whittington · 646 So. 2d 343 - In Re Quaid · 597 So. 2d 444 - Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. Boutall · In re Vaughan · State v. Lemons

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[u]nanimous informed consent by the lawyer’s clients is required before an aggregate settlement may be finalized. The requirement of informed consent cannot be avoided by obtaining client consent in advance to a future decision by the attorney or by a majority of the clients about the merits of an aggregate settlement. [Id. at 433 (citing ABA/BNA Lawyers’ Manual on Professional Conduct, supra, at 51:375).]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[a]ggregate settlements of the claims of multiple clients are not per se impermissible, but during the negotiation of the aggregate settlement, the lawyer must confer with all of his clients and fully disclose all details of the proposed settlement, including information about each client's claim and share of the proposed settlement.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.