Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

883 So. 2d 438

In re Pizzolatto

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided October 1, 2004

Supreme Court of Louisiana · decided 2004-10-01

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently December 2008

2 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2004-10-01

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

PER CURIAM.

¶2The Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) commenced an investigation into allegations that respondent commingled and converted funds. Prior to the filing of formal charges, respondent and the ODC submitted a joint petition for consent discipline. Having reviewed the petition,

¶3IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that Nicholas Pizzolatto, Jr., Louisiana Bar Roll number 7722, be suspended from the practice of law in Louisiana for a period of six months. This suspension shall be fully deferred, subject to respondent’s successful completion of a two-year period of probation governed by the conditions set forth in the petition for consent discipline. Any violation of the conditions of probation, or any other misconduct during the probationary period, may be grounds for making the deferred suspension executory, or imposing additional discipline, as appropriate.

¶4IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty days from the date of finality of this court’s judgment until paid.

/883/so2d/438 · .json · Public domain