Sochor v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
175
cited by 175 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
January 2019
most recently cited
3 federal appellate · 170 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Brady v. State of Maryland · Williams v. Taylor · Giglio v. United States · Lockett v. Ohio
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 175 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“As long as the trial court's findings are supported by competent substantial evidence, `this Court will not substitute its judgment for that of the trial court on questions of fact, likewise of the credibility of the witnesses as well as the weight to be given to the evidence by the trial court.'”
13 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Hertz v. State · Connor v. State“there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel's unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different. A reasonable probability is a probability sufficient to undermine confidence in the outcome.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“defer[ring] to the factual findings made by the trial court to the extent they are supported by competent, substantial evidence, but review[ing] de novo the application of those facts to the law.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.