883 So. 2d 908 - Rodriguez v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
October 2014
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 630 So. 2d 521 - Hale v. State · Daniels v. State · 867 So. 2d 469 - Fuller v. State · Kiedrowski v. State · Philmore v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“... there is nothing in the Criminal Punishment Code that prohibits the imposition of consecutive standard sentences, even when the sentences arise from offenses committed in a single criminal episode. See § 921.0024(2), Fla. Stat. (2001)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“consecutive sentences, which arise from one criminal episode and together exceed the maximum incarceration permitted for any individual count under the Prison Releasee Reoffender Punishment Act”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“is satisfied when the maximum sentence for each offense is increased.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.