Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

883 S.W.2d 112

State v. Silinzy

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided September 13, 1994

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 1994-09-13

Decided 1994-09-13

¶1ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2Defendant appeals after a jury convicted him of first degree assault- and armed criminal action. We affirm.

¶3Further, we find no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion and affirm by summary order. Rule 30.-25(b). A memorandum setting forth the rea*113sons for our decision has been issued to the parties for their use only.

/883/sw2d/112 · .json · Public domain