Bease v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
November 2018
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Brinegar v. United States · Florida v. Royer · Schmerber v. State of California · Traylor v. State · Lewis v. Ward
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Even excluding the failed PBT and HGN testing results, the record reflects sufficient other evidence to establish probable cause for the administration of the intoxilyzer test and to admit the presumptive intoxication evidence disclosed by that scientific testing. The record reflects that Bease spoke in a rapid manner to Trooper Penrod, smelled of alcohol, admitted that he consumed alcoholic beverages the night before, had bloodshot and glassy eyes, and had just committed a traffic violation by making an improper lane change in an abrupt manner. 45”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“to have given consent to chemical tests, including a test of the breath to determine the presence of alcohol or drugs.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Lefebvre v. State“quantum of trustworthy factual information”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Lefebvre v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.