Taylor Bay Protective Ass'n v. Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency’s Empirical Analysis
884 F.2d 1073 · 1989
Citation profile
8 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently January 2009
8 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 16 U.S.C. § 662 · 28 U.S.C. § 2401 · 33 U.S.C. § 702C · 42 U.S.C. § 4332 (§ 102 of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969) · 5 U.S.C. § 701
Relies on Anderson v. City of Bessemer City · United States v. United States Gypsum Co. · Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. Volpe · Block v. Community Nutrition Institute · Lemon v. Kurtzman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“precludes judicial review [of agency action] in those situations where Congress expresses an intent to prohibit judicial review.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“it is Congress's role to determine the adequacy of the study and report, not the courts.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.