Perez v. Simmons’s Empirical Analysis
884 F.2d 1136 · 1988
Citation profile
23 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 43 later decisions — most recently December 2020 · most notably United States v. Litteral (1990), United States v. Harper (1991)
23 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Payton v. New York · City of Canton v. Harris · Carnegie v. United States · Steagald v. United States · Sloan v. Hicks
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 43 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Unless a jury finds that the officers had reasonable grounds for believing that Albert was a co-resident of the apartment, and for believing that Albert was in the apartment at the time, see Payton, 445 U.S. at 603 , 100 S.Ct. at 1388 , the search was in violation of Irma Perez’s constitutional rights.””
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“However, if the officers did not have reasonable grounds for believing that Albert resided in the apartment, the search was illegal under Steagald [v. United States, 451 U.S. 204 , 68 L.Ed.2d 38 (1981) ].”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“The Fourth Amendment's protection against unreasonable searches in a person's home is not diminished by the mere presence of a guest in the home.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. United States v. Risse · Motley
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.