Lipscomb v. Simmons’s Empirical Analysis
884 F.2d 1242 · 1989
Citation profile
8 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently July 2003
8 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Estelle v. Gamble · Santosky v. Kramer · Joshua Deshaney, a Minor, by His Guardian Ad Litem, and Melody Deshaney,s v. Winnebago County Department of Social Services, et al. · Bounds v. Smith · Plyler v. Doe
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“CSD will protect a child's right to live with his or her immediate or extended family.... In determining either the temporary or permanent placement of a child, CSD will consider placement with relatives in preference to persons the child does not know.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.