Federal Deposit Insurance v. Former Officers & Directors of Metropolitan Bank’s Empirical Analysis
884 F.2d 1304 · 1989
Citation profile
19 federal appellate · 11 district · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 60 later decisions — most recently May 2022 · most notably Federal Deposit Insurance v. McSweeney (1992), United States v. Kensington Hospital (1991)
19 federal appellate · 11 district · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2415 (Indian Claims Limitation Act of 1982)
Relies on Badaracco v. Commissioner · Guaranty Trust Co of New York v. United States · Ohio v. Gallagher · E. I. Dupont De Nemours & Co. v. Davis · Federal Deposit Insurance v. Fonseca
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 60 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(a) Subject to the provisions of section 2416 of this title, and except as otherwise provided by Congress, every action for money damages brought by the United States or an officer or agency thereof which is founded upon any contract express or implied in law or fact, shall be barred unless the complaint is filed within six years after the right of action accrues ...: Provided, ... [an additional ninety days shall be added in the case of actions brought by the United States for a recognized tribe, band or group of American Indians, etc.].”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“It is settled law that state limitations statutes are relevant in determining a claim's viability at the time the federal agency acquires the claim. If the state statute of limitations has expired before the government acquires a claim, that claim is not revived by transfer to a federal agency.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“(A) IN GENERAL. — Notwithstanding any provision of any contract, the applicable statute of limitations with regard to any action brought by the Corporation as conservator or receiver shall be— (i) in the case of any contract claim, the longer of— (I) the 6-year period beginning on the date the claim accrues; or (II) the period applicable under State law[.] (B) DETERMINATION OF THE DATE ON WHICH A CLAIM ACCRUES. — For purposes of subparagraph (A), the date on which the statute of limitations begins to run on any claim described in such subparagraph shall be the later of— (i) the date of the appointment of the Corporation as conservator or receiver; or (ii) the date on which the cause of action accrues.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.