Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 884 F.2d 1323 - Sweetwater Citicorp Acceptance Company Inc v. W Robison

Sweetwater Citicorp Acceptance Company Inc v. W Robison’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

67
cited by 67 later decisions
2
states following
January 2019
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 5 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 67 later decisions — most recently January 2019 · most notably Acequia Inc. v. Clinton (1994), McFarland v. Leyh (1995)

4 federal appellate · 5 district · 3 state decisions

3901980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hein v. Ruti-Sweetwater, Inc. · Nordberg v. Sanchez · Delgado Oil Co. v. Torres · Tennessee Wheel & Rubber Co. v. Captron Corporate Air Fleet (In Re Tennessee Wheel & Rubber Co.) · Webster v. Barnes Banking Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 67 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the retention and enforcement by the debtor, by the trustee, or by a representative of the estate appointed for such purpose, [of any claim or interest belonging to the debtor or to the estate].”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The primary concern is whether a successful recovery by the appointed representative would benefit the debtor's estate and particularly, the debtor's unsecured creditors.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[P]ost-petition avoidance actions should be pursued in a manner that will satisfy the basic bankruptcy purpose of treating all similarly situated creditors alike; one or more similarly situated creditors should not be able to pursue an avoidance action for their exclusive benefit.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.