Guercio v. Brody’s Empirical Analysis
884 F.2d 1372 · 1989
Citation profile
3 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1295 · 28 U.S.C. § 1346 (Federal Tort Claims Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 601 · 28 U.S.C. § 602 (Administrative Office of the United States Courts Personnel Act of 1990) · 28 U.S.C. § 609 · 5 U.S.C. § 5596
Relies on Mitchell v. Forsyth · United States v. Testan · United States v. Mitchell · United States v. Mitchell · United States v. Hohri
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he district court did not have jurisdiction over a claim satisfying the requirements of the Little Tucker Act, and for that reason we are without jurisdiction to hear this appeal.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Banks v. Garrett
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.