Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 884 F.2d 1518 - United States v. Bernal

United States v. Bernal’s Empirical Analysis

884 F.2d 1518 · 1989

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
1
states following
March 2002
most recently cited

24 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently March 2002 · most notably United States v. Ruiz (1990), United States v. Gomez-Pabon (1990)

24 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

220198919902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2 · 21 U.S.C. § 812 (§ 202 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act)

Relies on Blockburger v. United States · Solem v. Helm · United States v. Tucker · Vandygriff v. Phillips · Hannahville Indian Community v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is impossible for me to understand that if the defendant says this is the first time that he was involved in drugs how could it be that he had 17 kilos of cocaine 90 percent pure? That is inconceivable because you don't have access to that amount of drugs unless you have been dealing in drugs for quite a number of years.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “in the light most favorable to the government, drawing all legitimate inferences and resolving all credibility determinations in favor of the verdict.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.