Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 884 F.2d 442 - Barry v. Bowen

Barry v. Bowen’s Empirical Analysis

884 F.2d 442 · 1989

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
1
states following
December 2015
most recently cited

18 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently December 2015 · most notably United States v. Horn (1994), Graham v. United States (1992)

18 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions

2001989199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 2072 · 28 U.S.C. § 2412 · 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935)

Relies on United States v. Mitchell · Block v. North Dakota Board of University and School Lands North Dakota Board of University and School Lands · Kerr v. United States District Court for the Northern District of California · Ed. Kerr v. Screen Extras Guild, Inc., a Corporation, Richard A. Perkins, Counsel for Ed Kerr v. Screen Extras Guild, Inc., a Corporation, H. O'Neil Shanks, and Norman Stevans, Richard A. Perkins, Counsel For · Fortin v. Commissioner of Massachusetts Department of Public Welfare

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “can be viewed as an explicit waiver of sovereign immunity”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “judicial discretion must not yield to such impulses.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.