Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 884 F.2d 62 - Huberman v. Perales

Huberman v. Perales’s Empirical Analysis

884 F.2d 62 · 1989

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
March 2019
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently March 2019

5 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

401989199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 5 U.S.C. § 553 (Administrative Procedure Act of 1946) · 7 U.S.C. § 1281 (Agricultural Act of 1948) · 7 U.S.C. § 2011 (Charitable Assistance and Food Bank Act of 1987) · 7 U.S.C. § 2012 · 7 U.S.C. § 2014 · 7 U.S.C. § 2020 · 7 U.S.C. § 2027

Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc. · Chemical Manufacturers Association v. Natural Resources Defense Council Inc · Aluminum Co. of America v. Central Lincoln Peoples' Utility District · American Hospital Ass'n v. Bowen

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(A) receives supplemental security income benefits ... or (B) receives Federally or State administered supplemental assistance ..., interim assistance pending receipt of supplemental security income, disability-related medical assistance .. ., or disability-based State general assistance benefits ...; (3) receives disability or blindness payments ... or receives disability retirement benefits from a governmental agency because of a disability considered permanent under section 221(i) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 421(i))____”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “By declaring the implementing regulations interpretive, the [agency] expressed [its] judgment that ... [its] regulations did not make ... a change, retroactive or otherwise.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “this Act and the amendments made by this Act shall become effective on the date of enactment of this Act.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.