Waye v. Murray’s Empirical Analysis
884 F.2d 765 · 1989
Citation profile
17 federal appellate · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 40 later decisions — most recently February 2010 · most notably 15 Cal. 4th 795 - People v. Samayoa (1997), Medina v. Singletary (1995)
17 federal appellate · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Cedar Coal Co. v. United Mine Workers · Waye v. Townley · Waye v. Townley
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]his circuit consistently has “rejected the notion that there is either a procedural or constitutional rule of ineffective assistance of an expert witness, rather than ineffective assistance of counsel” ... [i]t will nearly always be possible in cases involving the basic human emotions to find one expert witness who disagrees with another and to procure an affidavit to that effect from the second prospective witness.' To inaugurate a constitutional or procedural rule of an ineffective' expert witness in lieu of the constitutional standard of an ineffective attorney, we think, is going further than the federal procedural demands of a fair trial and the constitution require.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“all of the facts on which the current petition was based were either known or available to the petitioner.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Barnes v. Thompson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.