Pierre v. Sullivan’s Empirical Analysis
884 F.2d 799 · 1989
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 43 later decisions — most recently April 2016 · most notably Trimiar v. Sullivan (1992), Leggett v. Chater (1995)
4 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1381 (§ 1601 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 402 (§ 202 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Szubak v. Secretary of Health & Human Services · Dorsey v. Heckler · Chaney v. Schweiker · Kane v. Heckler · Kimbrough v. Secretary of Health & Human Services
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 43 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“may not reweigh the evidence or try the issues de novo or substitute its judgment for that of the Secretary.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“). 5 Id. at 11-16. Our review of the record convinces us that there is substantial evidence to support the ALJ's conclusion. Accordingly, we must reject the grounds of error set forth by the Appellant and affirm the District Court. A. 10 At the outset, the Court notes its function in this matter. Judicial review of the Secretary's final decision is limited in scope by 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). 6 Our role”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Trimiar v. Sullivan“‘does not require a consultative examination at government expense unless the record establishes that such an examination is necessary to enable the [ALJ] to make the disability decision.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. McCuller v. Barnhart
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.