Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 884 F.2d 926 - Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs v. Consolidation Coal Co.

Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs v. Consolidation Coal Co.’s Empirical Analysis

884 F.2d 926 · 1989

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
1
states following
August 2012
most recently cited

16 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently August 2012

16 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

1401989199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 30 U.S.C. § 802 · 30 U.S.C. § 902 · 30 U.S.C. § 932 · 33 U.S.C. § 921

Relies on Richardson v. Perales · Massa v. United States · Gibas v. Saginaw Mining Co. · United States v. Georgia · Moseley v. Peabody Coal Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “committed any legal errors or exceeded its statutory scope of review of the administrative law judge's factual determinations. Id. (citation omitted) Under Sec. 921(b)(3) the A.L.J.'s findings of fact may only be set aside if they are not supported by "substantial evidence in the record considered as a whole.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The Board may not engage in a de novo review, ... or substitute its own factual findings because it believes them to be more reasonable than those reached by the A.L.J.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Our review of a decision of the Board is limited to assuring that the correct statutory standards have been applied and that no errors of law have been made.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.